SB 1070 -- A Symptom of Two Deteriorating Nations

The situation in Arizona is not going to benefit anyone except those that have a "stake" in keeping the border open. This comes from creating and maintaining chaos and violence for border towns on both sides, drug trade, feds., and global interests that want the borders gone along with national soverignty for both the U.S. and Mexico.

Bill SB 1070, if nothing else, has brought massive amounts of attention to the deteriorating situation along the U.S./Mexican border.  That is one positive aspect that has come from this.  The "firestorm" that has been created by this controversial bill, however, has polarized people into groups and factions with their own interests and political beliefs.  While this issue has been going on now for decades, the situation is starting to flare-up as states are now making moves in response to failure and chaos resulting from "open-borders" policy.

It's easy to get swept up in all the media hype and misconceptions that exist regarding Arizona's new bill.  Therefore it's vital to breakdown what has led to this, who is responsible, who gains and loses, and what is the endgame in all of this.  What's certain is that people on both sides of the establishment created "political spectrum" are being misled by very powerful elements that have a vested interest in the chaos.

This orchestrated chaos leads folks to "wildly" throw around terms like nazi, racism, hate, brown people, anti-mexican, etc.  This tends to be the "fuel" for the fire that the "left" uses to excuse the lax enforcement of the border.  Putting it into perspective, Mexico uses much stricter and violent means to secure their borders, especially regarding their southern border.  It is also important to point out that if this issue was happening on the Canadian border, this would have been resolved a long time ago as the "race" component would not have come into "play" by open border apologists wanting to maintain lawlessness.  At the same time, the political "right," in particular the neo-con factions have been used and demonized, much like tea-party movements, to discredit border security as mere racism and some form of neo-nazi facism.  In reality, one need only look at the literal "drug war" that is taking place in border communities on both sides which is causing widespread violence and death. 

What is fueling this border chaos are various groups that are involved in the destabilization of both the Mexican government and U.S. sovereignty.  From the CIA instigated drug war (see also poppy in Afghanistan) to globalist's interests in using the border destabilization as an excuse to further NAFTA and a North American Union, it is a bad situation for both Americans and Mexicans alike.  Mexico is a failed state that has been taken over by druglords and the few multi-billionaires that benefit from the chaos on the border as they use the U.S. as a pressure release valve for their self-inflicted problems.  Washington D.C. politicians use the border for political reasons to stump for supporters and hand-out dependency to illegals.  However, both sides are bought and controlled by off-shore banking interests that have control of both nations.  This is how a simple national issue such as legal passage from one nation to another regardless of what citizenship you have, gets turned into a "maelstrom" of misinformation and emotional agendas. 

The Arizona bill, while bringing attention to the problem and showing the desperation of border states to do something, has some inherent problems as it can indeed be abused and misused on legal citizens in Arizona by enforcement.  As the U.S. is becoming more of a "police-state" as Mexico already is, a bill like SB 1070 can end up being worse than doing nothing.  Open border policy creates conditions which drives state governments to consider these methods of enforcement.  This is then what drives civil libertarians and minorities to then be concerned about things like profiling and search and seizure issues.  For those folks that have these concerns, remember, the feds and race-baiting groups like La Raza are also using this situation to further their own agendas. 

In the end, the only benefactors of this will be a large and ever-oppressive federal govenment, globalists, and the off-shore bankers who will "cash-in" on the chaos.  Americans and Mexicans will both lose in the end.  They will lose liberty and their nations respectively. antelope canyon photos bryce canyon national park photos bryce canyon photos horseshoe bend prints fire pit art bryce canyon greeting cards glen canyon greeting cards black and white tulip prints peach orchard prints grand canyon sunset framed prints

Shouldn't Everyone be a "Truther?"

Only in America today can you be called a "truther" and the agenda is to make it sound like that's a bad thing.

From 911 truth, to the birther "truth" movement, to any other movement that wants to get to the "bottom" of things where there are "glaring" questions to be answered, it is now becoming commonplace to demonize and mock any such movement in the name of collective acceptance.  This stems from the "blind" faith that the public has entrusted in the media.  If the media covers or brings it up, it must be true.  However if it's not mentioned by the media or the media dismisses it as "conspiracy" or non-truth, than the population accepts it as such.  Many Americans have begun to figure this out and the growing numbers of "truthers" is becoming a strong and vibrant movement.  Too many, however, are still taking the "lead" that is put forth to them by establishment information sources. 

Which form of media should the public trust?  Should they trust the independent movement that calls upon the public to read and research what they are reporting and posting, or should they trust the establishment media that "cashes-in" their journalistic credibility to maintain unprecedented "access" to political figures, elites, and the corporate interests that own and operate them?

Remember, the "gulf of tonkin" incident was reported by the establishment media as "real" and legitimate.  The same can be said of the U.S.S. Liberty attack, the Oklahoma City Bombing, 911, and other classic examples of misreporting or blatent complacency.  It's the "truther" or independent movement that is exposing, digging, and bringing "light" to these subjects by merely going 100% after the truth and using official documents, evidence, and formerly classified info to back it up.  The movement also encourages, and even insists, that the public educate themselves, question, and then verify what they are reporting or posting.  As I write this, I am insisting that the reader verify my findings, facts, and evidence.  Would mainstream media sources make such a recommendation? 

The next time you see any type of "truther" demonized by the media or the general public, ask yourself these questions:

              -Why shouldn't they ask questions or challenge the
                "official story?" 
              -Isn't that what any logical or intelligent person would do?
              -Isn't that why we have the 1st amendment? 
              -Wasn't that the advice of the founders? 

Why would we just believe an "official story" or any "wire" story that is just dispersed throughout the establishment media without challenging it's claims?  If it wasn't for independent media and the "viral" nature of information on the internet, we would have never uncovered all the fraud and deception surrounding the hoaxes of "man-made climate change" and the H1N1 fraud.  On these issues, the mainstream media was willingly complacent and even had a "vested" interest until they were forced to cover the issues and not ignore them.  Even afterward they continue to support, through their corporate and political interests, these agendas without apology or remorse.

We now live in the Information Age and we must support and maintain the independent mode of information and media.  We must also continue to encourage and promote individuals to question, verify, and be generally informed about what is reported or posted.  We all need to be "truthers" and scorn any media pundit that mocks, ridicules, or attempts to discredit any of you that merely wants the truth and won't back down from being called a "troofer," wing-nut, "tin-foil" hatter, or any other form of personal attack that is beneath journalistic credibility.  If they attack the messenger, they tend to not have a message. hoodoos photos hoodoo photos terminal tower photos tower city photos music room photos music room art harp photos bryce canyon painting canvas prints lamp post painting canvas prints niagara falls prints red tulip art fantasy landscape prints