The Left-Wing Ignorance of Wall Street

Note to the left-wingers that think they are doing anyone a favor by portraying themselves as anti-capitalist/wall street revolutionaries: Stop!


Please stop helping the establishment to “short-circuit” the legitimate movement to expose the global bankers through the Federal Reserve System. Your new-age “revolution” against Wall Street is like going after the mob by taking down a “speak-easy.” Going after the casino front that is Wall Street will not stop the powers behind the curtain.

Recent remarks by the likes of Michael Moore and Roseanne Barr do nothing to help bring a legitimate message to the masses. In-fact, figures like Moore are actually doing the bidding of big globalist power-brokers like Warren Buffet and George Soros. Moore recently stated that capitalism is the problem and needs to be eliminated. This has always been his consistent message but by downplaying the Federal Reserve he shows that he has no real interest in going after the handlers of this system. Besides the fact that Moore is a hypocrite who has used capitalism and the free-market to make himself a pretty sizeable fortune, he either has no idea that the banker bailouts had nothing to do with capitalism or he doesn’t care. I’m betting on the latter. Barr is now calling for a violent approach to dealing with the situation. Calling for re-education camps and “beheadings” is hardly a warm and fuzzy left-wing solution. It also puts a “radical” face on a serious movement with a nice aroma of fascism.

The controlled left-wing movement is a “scorched-earth” policy that has more to do with supporting an easily corrupt and wealth accumulating centralized collective than an anti-greed and corruption movement. Too many well-meaning liberals are getting themselves caught in this “bear-trap” much like the neo-conservatives get caught into thinking the Federal Reserve System is just good free-market policy. This is hardly in line with reality. The Federal Reserve is just a consortium of global powers that control both political parties and have the ultimate goal of stopping any legitimate resistance to their authority.

Liberals need to listen to the words of one of their own. John F. Kennedy laid it out quite plainly when he called out these same powers-that-be and began the process of eliminating the Federal Reserve System. His assassination ended this, but today brings an opportunity for Democrats to pick up the Kennedy mantle, become truly informed, and take a positive and productive stand against the globalists that seek to bring this nation into receivership. Capitalism didn’t do this to you, the ever expanding federal government power that has a public/private relationship to the bankers did.

Conspiracy Theory: The Convenient “No Contest”

I have to say it never ceases to amaze me how people’s selective acceptance of facts based on personal desire for a particular conclusion to be met. Nowhere is this more on display than with the two-party political system. As a “truther” I have to admit, I feel a little used by these left-wingers and right-wingers. Like all the other “truthers” out there, I’m kind of tired of sniffing and digging for the facts on all these pertinent issues just to have these two political camps “cherry pick” what they want to be truth and what they want to be “conspiracy.”


Of course I’m not at all really upset about being used, but it still is quite a disturbing sight to watch this behavior of selective “truth” acceptance. What this shows is that the conclusion is more important to these folks than the facts. This is not a surprise considering both of these political camps are based on half-truths and often all-out-lies. So, when the facts do happen to fit with the political conclusion, it’s “chest thumping” time for the victors of that particular argument. They scored political points and it’s time to gloat even if the referee missed a call or the ball never really crossed the goal line to use a football analogy. If, however, the facts don’t fit the desired conclusion, well it’s time to pull the “conspiracy” card out of the deck. Both of these political factions have done this at nauseam.

For the left-wingers it’s the new-age religion of Man-Made Global Warming Theory. For Right-wingers it’s the mythology of the official 911 story. Both sides will be astute “fact-finding” hounds quick to pounce on any evidence that supports their position. No stone left unturned. No piece of evidence left unanalyzed. Of course, this is if the facts and evidence lead them to the conclusion they are seeking. When that conclusion is not supported by the facts and evidence, well, time to put away the detective gear and get out the dogma. It’s time to go from being a patriot to being a nationalist or from an independent thinker to a gatekeeper. Suddenly motivated, not by truth regardless of where it leads you, but out of desire of a spokesman doing “damage control” when your “guy” finds himself in a public relations disaster. The easiest and quickest solution for this is to deflect questions. This is no different than when the facts don’t add up to your conclusion.

“Conspiracy Theory” is a nice little label that is a quick fix for deflecting the facts. It’s this designed automatic disqualifier that is used to short circuit the argument before the data is even analyzed. Conspiracy Theory is just defined as an explanation of an event as being the result of a plot by some group often behind the scenes. It has been twisted into being used as a label to discredit any viable theory as “fantastical” or “unlikely” and to be automatically filed next to Big Foot and the Loch Ness Monster. Mind you, any event that had been planned by a group either openly or in secret is a conspiracy by definition. Otherwise, it’s coincidental. If you listen to some of these folks who use the “conspiracy card” you’d think Watergate was never possible.

Regardless of the facts that came out during Climategate, the left-wing proponents of Global Warming are going to continue to label deniers as proponents of a corporate/oil company conspiracy to undermine “their” position regardless of the fact that most oil companies and corporations support the position that they take. On the other side, the right-wing (and the left-wing to a degree too) are going to look at all the evidence of Al-Qaeda and CIA ties and chalk it up to conspiracy theory even though the connections are well documented across a wide spectrum. So facts, depending on who you present them to, will either be the “smoking-gun” or of no practical significance.

In the end, human beings have a desire to maintain a “worldview” that often outweighs the need to know the truth. This is the essence of why humans are so easily tribalised and set against each other. People are not divided on the facts, but on the lack of desire to accept facts on certain issues. It does take strength to go after the truth, regardless of where it leads you because quite often it leads you to a place you don’t want to go. People have to learn that “truth” is the light that will unite us all and “willful ignorance” is the mother of all sins. It’s one thing if you are simply not informed. It’s another to not want to be and give labels to others who are.

Pick Your Poison

The United State Government, run by globalist/off-shore interests, have given the people of this nation two choices going forward.  These choices are basically a loyalty to "state" choice that "we the people" are being forced to make.  Before we get to these two options, let us review what has transpired to bring us to this point in a system that is alledgedly run by "the people" in a so-called "free market society." 

Without going too far into history and detail, basically we've been told that our resources are dominion of the federal government and/or corporate interests for our economic, environmental, and sustainable well being.  We've been told it's "off limits" to drill in many places for oil in this country, not necessarily just for any environmental impact, but for some "twisted" economic reasons of market/price control and conservation built on the idea of "peak oil."  Yet, the government, and mega global corporations like BP and GE, as exhibited multiple times in history, have done far more damage environmentally, economically, and socially than the phantom "strawman" that they claim to protect us from in the first place.  That "strawman," by the way, is you.  

As a result, our government, military, and mega-corporations have entrenched their "will" in many nations across the globe.  Countless examples of regime changes, overthrows, false-flag operations, financial backings of extremist dictators and murderers, and ultimately the expansion of a new-age global empire that claims the "will" of the global community has taken place much to our complacency. 

Now as the middle east goes through a new round of destabilization ultimately being pushed by the globalists on many of their own puppets in these countries and riding the backs of well-intentioned middle easterners that just want the foreign imperialism to end, we see a new round of spiking energy, food, and other costs making it harder for the average american to get by. Local, state, and federal government officials and media "talking-heads" are now promoting each institution in a state of "bankruptcy" to scam the taxpayers out of more tax dollars, liberties, and individual non-dependence on the "welfare state."  All this to centralize power to the banking elite and resource monopolies.  This leads us to the choice. 

The first option is that we continue to support "imperialism" across the globe so that we can go on having our "standard of living" at least until they finish off bankrupting and killing-off the rest of American productivity in the economy.  This will result in making us all debt slaves and serfs while they continue to limit our access to our own resources.  This option will lead to more troops dying, more radical regimes and terrorists (many backed by our own government), and likely many more millions of innocent civilians around the world getting killed.  None of this has anything to do with protecting you from terrorists or keeping you safe.  In reality, it does the opposite and connects you as a willing accomplice to the crime.  When they get finished using this nation as the driving force behind globalism, you will be left to "pay the price" for all the damage done, not them.  You will be left undefended against the angry hordes around the world as they condition the rest of the world that it's your lifestyle and selfishness that led to the exploitation of their lands.  Like a parasite, they will simply attach to a new host and continue the tyranny abroad.  Hello China. 

The second option is that we see option #1 as a pretty bad idea and proven to only benefit globalist interests and don't stand for this any longer.  Then you will need to prepare as they will continue to squeeze us as a society until we submit to the empire.  High prices, chaos, food shortages, and whatever else they throw at us will be difficult to deal with, but rarely is doing the "right thing" ever easy. 

Ultimately, whichever choice you make, you will get both "poisons" from the elites.  You will end up in the same place and at some point you will have to fight the "forced-feeding" of both "poisons" for the sake of the future generations.  Faced with these two choices should serve to wake-up the masses to the "corner" they have been forced into.  The elite have been clever about making you believe the corner doesn't exist and that the room is endless.  They have also convinced most that the two poisons are merely two flavors of kool-aid.  One is "patriot" flavored and one is "conspiracy" flavored.  If you drink the "patriot" flavor, you are a good American and care about it's future.  If you drink the "conspiracy" flavor, you are crazy and dangerous to America and you don't care about protecting it from phantom foes.  It's now up to you to see the fraud and decide how important you see yourselves and your future generations.

SB 1070 -- A Symptom of Two Deteriorating Nations

The situation in Arizona is not going to benefit anyone except those that have a "stake" in keeping the border open. This comes from creating and maintaining chaos and violence for border towns on both sides, drug trade, feds., and global interests that want the borders gone along with national soverignty for both the U.S. and Mexico.

Bill SB 1070, if nothing else, has brought massive amounts of attention to the deteriorating situation along the U.S./Mexican border.  That is one positive aspect that has come from this.  The "firestorm" that has been created by this controversial bill, however, has polarized people into groups and factions with their own interests and political beliefs.  While this issue has been going on now for decades, the situation is starting to flare-up as states are now making moves in response to failure and chaos resulting from "open-borders" policy.

It's easy to get swept up in all the media hype and misconceptions that exist regarding Arizona's new bill.  Therefore it's vital to breakdown what has led to this, who is responsible, who gains and loses, and what is the endgame in all of this.  What's certain is that people on both sides of the establishment created "political spectrum" are being misled by very powerful elements that have a vested interest in the chaos.

This orchestrated chaos leads folks to "wildly" throw around terms like nazi, racism, hate, brown people, anti-mexican, etc.  This tends to be the "fuel" for the fire that the "left" uses to excuse the lax enforcement of the border.  Putting it into perspective, Mexico uses much stricter and violent means to secure their borders, especially regarding their southern border.  It is also important to point out that if this issue was happening on the Canadian border, this would have been resolved a long time ago as the "race" component would not have come into "play" by open border apologists wanting to maintain lawlessness.  At the same time, the political "right," in particular the neo-con factions have been used and demonized, much like tea-party movements, to discredit border security as mere racism and some form of neo-nazi facism.  In reality, one need only look at the literal "drug war" that is taking place in border communities on both sides which is causing widespread violence and death. 

What is fueling this border chaos are various groups that are involved in the destabilization of both the Mexican government and U.S. sovereignty.  From the CIA instigated drug war (see also poppy in Afghanistan) to globalist's interests in using the border destabilization as an excuse to further NAFTA and a North American Union, it is a bad situation for both Americans and Mexicans alike.  Mexico is a failed state that has been taken over by druglords and the few multi-billionaires that benefit from the chaos on the border as they use the U.S. as a pressure release valve for their self-inflicted problems.  Washington D.C. politicians use the border for political reasons to stump for supporters and hand-out dependency to illegals.  However, both sides are bought and controlled by off-shore banking interests that have control of both nations.  This is how a simple national issue such as legal passage from one nation to another regardless of what citizenship you have, gets turned into a "maelstrom" of misinformation and emotional agendas. 

The Arizona bill, while bringing attention to the problem and showing the desperation of border states to do something, has some inherent problems as it can indeed be abused and misused on legal citizens in Arizona by enforcement.  As the U.S. is becoming more of a "police-state" as Mexico already is, a bill like SB 1070 can end up being worse than doing nothing.  Open border policy creates conditions which drives state governments to consider these methods of enforcement.  This is then what drives civil libertarians and minorities to then be concerned about things like profiling and search and seizure issues.  For those folks that have these concerns, remember, the feds and race-baiting groups like La Raza are also using this situation to further their own agendas. 

In the end, the only benefactors of this will be a large and ever-oppressive federal govenment, globalists, and the off-shore bankers who will "cash-in" on the chaos.  Americans and Mexicans will both lose in the end.  They will lose liberty and their nations respectively.

Shouldn't Everyone be a "Truther?"

Only in America today can you be called a "truther" and the agenda is to make it sound like that's a bad thing.

From 911 truth, to the birther "truth" movement, to any other movement that wants to get to the "bottom" of things where there are "glaring" questions to be answered, it is now becoming commonplace to demonize and mock any such movement in the name of collective acceptance.  This stems from the "blind" faith that the public has entrusted in the media.  If the media covers or brings it up, it must be true.  However if it's not mentioned by the media or the media dismisses it as "conspiracy" or non-truth, than the population accepts it as such.  Many Americans have begun to figure this out and the growing numbers of "truthers" is becoming a strong and vibrant movement.  Too many, however, are still taking the "lead" that is put forth to them by establishment information sources. 

Which form of media should the public trust?  Should they trust the independent movement that calls upon the public to read and research what they are reporting and posting, or should they trust the establishment media that "cashes-in" their journalistic credibility to maintain unprecedented "access" to political figures, elites, and the corporate interests that own and operate them?

Remember, the "gulf of tonkin" incident was reported by the establishment media as "real" and legitimate.  The same can be said of the U.S.S. Liberty attack, the Oklahoma City Bombing, 911, and other classic examples of misreporting or blatent complacency.  It's the "truther" or independent movement that is exposing, digging, and bringing "light" to these subjects by merely going 100% after the truth and using official documents, evidence, and formerly classified info to back it up.  The movement also encourages, and even insists, that the public educate themselves, question, and then verify what they are reporting or posting.  As I write this, I am insisting that the reader verify my findings, facts, and evidence.  Would mainstream media sources make such a recommendation? 

The next time you see any type of "truther" demonized by the media or the general public, ask yourself these questions:

              -Why shouldn't they ask questions or challenge the
                "official story?" 
              -Isn't that what any logical or intelligent person would do?
              -Isn't that why we have the 1st amendment? 
              -Wasn't that the advice of the founders? 

Why would we just believe an "official story" or any "wire" story that is just dispersed throughout the establishment media without challenging it's claims?  If it wasn't for independent media and the "viral" nature of information on the internet, we would have never uncovered all the fraud and deception surrounding the hoaxes of "man-made climate change" and the H1N1 fraud.  On these issues, the mainstream media was willingly complacent and even had a "vested" interest until they were forced to cover the issues and not ignore them.  Even afterward they continue to support, through their corporate and political interests, these agendas without apology or remorse.

We now live in the Information Age and we must support and maintain the independent mode of information and media.  We must also continue to encourage and promote individuals to question, verify, and be generally informed about what is reported or posted.  We all need to be "truthers" and scorn any media pundit that mocks, ridicules, or attempts to discredit any of you that merely wants the truth and won't back down from being called a "troofer," wing-nut, "tin-foil" hatter, or any other form of personal attack that is beneath journalistic credibility.  If they attack the messenger, they tend to not have a message.

THE VARIOUS LEVELS OF MEDIA FIREWALL

You could say, the media is designed to have multiple firewall levels for each level of awareness in the population. Each level gives you more truth, but until you breach all the levels, you will still be in the dark.

The 1st level is the "celebrity/tabloid level." This one snags quite a bit of people, right away. These are the folks that are easily controlled, easily entertained, and fall for all the sensationalism in society today. These folks are no threat to the establishment as they have no desire to know anything important. Celebrities of all walks of life tend to be used here to sell propaganda to the masses as well based merely on their status and not any truth or facts.

The 2nd level is the "local/nanny news" that many folks tune into and mistaken for "real" news. All it really is, is a local breakdown and dramatization of select pieces of events that happen in the region that "they" see as effective enough to create emotional responses to control the masses on a local level. This is also where the most repulsive "fake" news takes place. The "Nanny" news is anytime they decide it is their duty to tell the public how to live, eat, take care of their children, and dress when you walk outside of your house. This is those "reports" where they get the so-called "expert" to come on and let you know that you need to "bundle-up" when you go outside because its cold and you might catch cold. If you do catch a cold it's important to drink plenty of fluids and get good rest........ ....on and on and on." It's the most dehumanizing and elitist form of news that they feed to the masses that choose to be "out-of-the- loop" on truly important issues.

The 3rd level is a cleanup level for the first two. The first two are designed to "nail" women far more than men. So, to take care of the men, they give you "sports media." Yes, ESPN is the 3rd level of media designed to trap and control the many folks that think sports are the life-blood of America. These are mostly guys who think "Children's games" actually meen something. These are the ones that couldn't tell you a thing about our Republic, but know all the super bowl winners in the NFL. These folks are also very controlled by groups like the NCAA which funnels millions into the universities that act as the "gateways" to success in careers.